Atrium Underwriters’ ‘Boys’ Night Out’: toxic work culture still rife

-

Lloyd’s of London has issued a £1m fine to Atrium Underwriters because of tolerated discrimination, harassment and bullying over the numerous years.

This is the largest fine in Lloyd’s 336-year history.

These “serious failings” of the firm include a mishandling, bullying and harassment case, and also an inappropriate “Boys’ Night Out” event for staff.

This annual “Boys’ Night Out” saw employees, including two executives, taking part in heavy drinking, initiation games, and “discriminatory and harassing comments” directed towards female members of staff.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In response, Lloyds have launched a whistleblowing hotline, and have advanced policies targeted towards diversity and inclusion.

This confirms a recent report by CIPD, which highlights that interpersonal conflict and uncivil behaviour are still remarkably common in the workplace.

 

Lloyd’s disciplinary action to set an example

Chairman of Lloyds of London, Carnegie-Brown, said: “We continue to crackdown on bad behaviour. The important thing is we are taking action.”

“The market is becoming more diverse and inclusive,” Brown adds.

However, it is not this simple; women across the globe continue to face similar acts of discrimination in the workplace.

Almost a quarter (23%) of women between the ages of 16 and 30 have been sexually harassed at work (with only 8% reporting it), according to a poll by the Young Women’s Trust.

 

The importance of addressing bullying and harassment in the workplace

Bullying and harassment have extremely negative consequences for not only the victim, but also teams and organisations.

“It negatively impacts the attitudes, behaviour and health of staff, notably leading to higher levels of anxiety and depression, reduced self-esteem and performance, and increased absenteeism and turnover. It is vital that employers are equipped to understand where such behaviour stems from and how to prevent it,” says the CIPD report.

 

Prevention over cure

CIPD recommend focusing on the root cause of harassment within the workplace. They recommend that employers should:

  • Provide resources for staff to confidently approach workplace incivility
  • Ensure staff involvement in the implementation of the recourses to make interventions effective
  • Target both individual development and organisational processes through wide-ranging interventions

A toxic work culture breeds gender discrimination. Greater disciplinary policies like that exhibited by Lloyds should be adopted should similar actions occur within the workplace elsewhere.

Breeding a healthy workplace culture is essential in that is conducive to promoting equality, diversity, and inclusion.

 

What is the difference between bullying and harassment?

On a final note, it is important to separate the terms bullying and harassment, which are often used interchangeably. It is crucial for HR professionals to have a clear definition of the terms.

The Equality Act 2010 defines harassment as: ‘unwanted conduct related to a relevant protected characteristic, which has the purpose or effect of violating an individual’s dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for that individual.’

Bullying, whilst not specifically defined in UK law, is defined by Acas as: ‘offensive, intimidating, malicious or insulting behaviour, an abuse or misuse of power through means that undermine, humiliate, denigrate or injure the recipient.’

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Employers await clarity on employment reforms after Starmer exit

Recruitment and HR leaders have called for stability as further workplace measures remain scheduled for implementation through 2027.

Lloyds plans 1,000 AI roles as debate over jobs impact continues

The recruitment drive is adding momentum to arguments that emerging technologies may generate new skills demand rather than widespread workforce reductions.

Fake news? AI leaves workers questioning whether messages are genuine

Growing use of AI is making people more sceptical about digital communications, with many questioning whether messages are genuine.

Jobs data reliability questioned after ONS survey mistake

Concerns have emerged over the quality of upcoming labour market figures after a survey error resulted in more than 1,000 interviews being missed.
- Advertisement -

Sarah Williams: Beyond the traditional interview – redesigning hiring for neurodivergent talent

Neuroinclusive hiring is often treated as a specialist initiative, when it is a fundamentally a capability issue.

Recruitment firms caught up in rise in illegal working penalties

Increased enforcement activity has seen staffing businesses appear on Home Office penalty lists, prompting renewed focus on hiring compliance.

Must read

Robert Leeming: The ‘phony world’ of the living wage?

There is no doubt that George Osborne's living wage, to be launched next year, is a policy with its heart in the right place. For example, more than three and a half million women, almost 30 percent of the female workforce, will receive a pay rise as a result of the legislation.

Rosie Evans: What benefits should businesses offer in the post-COVID world?

"From an employee benefits perspective, many of the schemes put in place by companies have been rendered obsolete or unsuitable for post-pandemic working."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you