HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Companies risk hefty data breach fines by failing to destroy candidates’ CVs

-

HR managers and recruiters are putting their employers at risk of penalties of up to £17.5 million (€20 million) under imminent data protection regulations by failing to destroy sensitive data contained within job applicants’ CVs.

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which comes into force on 25 May, will apply to all companies that process personal data of European Union citizens.

CVs and application forms often reveal personal data about the subject including their home address, middle names and national insurance number — and sometimes even sensitive information, such as their physical or mental health condition and previous criminal convictions.

And since it’s customary for HR managers to print the CVs of prospective employees prior to interviewing them, they’re risking serious data breaches — and therefore hefty fines — unless they properly destroy the documents afterwards.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

This comes after identity fraud, particularly against young people, is reported to have risen by 30% and Facebook finds itself at the centre of a worldwide data breach scandal.

Organisations in breach of GDPR, which includes not having a person’s consent to process their data, can be fined up to 4% of their annual turnover, or €20 million (£17.5 million) — whichever is greater.

In fact, job candidates — and any data subjects — will have six rights under the new legislation: right of access, whereby they can request to be informed about what will be done with their data; right to rectification, meaning they can correct or update any data that’s held on file; and right to erasure, which allows them to have their data removed from a database at any time.

Prospective employees will also have the right to restriction of processing, whereby they can request their data is suspended from being processed in a database, the right to export all their data from files, and the right to object to their data being processed indefinitely.

Jonathan Richardson, managing director at secure shredding specialist Russell Richardson, said: “Ahead of the enforcement of GDPR, and in light of the Cambridge Analytica scandal, many businesses are rightfully focusing on cleaning up their electronic databases to remove the risk of breaches. But it’s equally important that they destroy hard copies of sensitive and personal data — a perfect example of which is printed CVs, which are often cast aside or disposed of insecurely after job interviews.”

Many businesses are beginning to outsource the shredding of confidential and sensitive documents for this reason. Although in-house office shredders are common, they typically use the ‘strip-cut’ method which produces ribbon-like strips of paper. In the wrong hands, waste paper shredded in this way can still be read and reassembled, meaning the data subject could still be at risk of identity fraud.

“Employing a regular shredding service removes this risk and gives businesses of all sizes peace of mind that they’re adhering to the new laws,” Jonathan added. “The size of the fines they’re avoiding by securely destroying confidential information far outweighs the cost of such services.

“And while recruiters often tell unsuccessful candidates: ‘We’ll keep your details on file,’ in future they’d be wise to rephrase this message.”

Rebecca joined the HRreview editorial team in January 2016. After graduating from the University of Sheffield Hallam in 2013 with a BA in English Literature, Rebecca has spent five years working in print and online journalism in Manchester and London. In the past she has been part of the editorial teams at Sleeper and Dezeen and has founded her own arts collective.

Latest news

Felicia Williams: Why ‘shadow work’ is quietly breaking your people strategy

Employees are losing seven hours a week to tasks that fall outside their core job description. For HR leaders, that’s the kind of stat that keeps you up at night.

Redundancies rise as 327,000 job losses forecast for 2026

UK job losses are set to rise again as redundancy warnings hit post-pandemic highs, with employers cutting roles amid rising costs and economic pressure.

Rise of ‘sickfluencers’ and AI advice sparks concern over attitudes to work

Online influencers and AI tools are shaping how people approach illness and employment, heaping pressure on employers.

‘Silent killer’ dust linked to 500 construction deaths a year as 600,000 workers face exposure

Hundreds of UK construction workers die each year from silica dust exposure as a new campaign calls for stronger workplace protections.
- Advertisement -

Leaders ‘overestimate’ how much workers use AI

Firms may be misreading workforce readiness for artificial intelligence, as frontline staff report far lower day-to-day adoption than executives expect.

Cost-of-living pressures ‘keep unhappy workers in their jobs’

Many say economic pressures are forcing them to remain in jobs they would otherwise leave, as pay and financial stability dominate career decisions.

Must read

Linda Morey-Burrows: How can office space affect your workplace wellbeing?

According to Linda Morey-Burrows, there are a number of fundamental basics that must be considering when designing an office space to co-operate with a wellbeing strategy.

Phil Austin: Could improving employee wellbeing solve the UK’s productivity puzzle?

Is there a clear solution to solving the UK’s productivity problem?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you