Companies risk hefty data breach fines by failing to destroy candidates’ CVs

-

HR managers and recruiters are putting their employers at risk of penalties of up to £17.5 million (€20 million) under imminent data protection regulations by failing to destroy sensitive data contained within job applicants’ CVs.

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which comes into force on 25 May, will apply to all companies that process personal data of European Union citizens.

CVs and application forms often reveal personal data about the subject including their home address, middle names and national insurance number — and sometimes even sensitive information, such as their physical or mental health condition and previous criminal convictions.

And since it’s customary for HR managers to print the CVs of prospective employees prior to interviewing them, they’re risking serious data breaches — and therefore hefty fines — unless they properly destroy the documents afterwards.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

This comes after identity fraud, particularly against young people, is reported to have risen by 30% and Facebook finds itself at the centre of a worldwide data breach scandal.

Organisations in breach of GDPR, which includes not having a person’s consent to process their data, can be fined up to 4% of their annual turnover, or €20 million (£17.5 million) — whichever is greater.

In fact, job candidates — and any data subjects — will have six rights under the new legislation: right of access, whereby they can request to be informed about what will be done with their data; right to rectification, meaning they can correct or update any data that’s held on file; and right to erasure, which allows them to have their data removed from a database at any time.

Prospective employees will also have the right to restriction of processing, whereby they can request their data is suspended from being processed in a database, the right to export all their data from files, and the right to object to their data being processed indefinitely.

Jonathan Richardson, managing director at secure shredding specialist Russell Richardson, said: “Ahead of the enforcement of GDPR, and in light of the Cambridge Analytica scandal, many businesses are rightfully focusing on cleaning up their electronic databases to remove the risk of breaches. But it’s equally important that they destroy hard copies of sensitive and personal data — a perfect example of which is printed CVs, which are often cast aside or disposed of insecurely after job interviews.”

Many businesses are beginning to outsource the shredding of confidential and sensitive documents for this reason. Although in-house office shredders are common, they typically use the ‘strip-cut’ method which produces ribbon-like strips of paper. In the wrong hands, waste paper shredded in this way can still be read and reassembled, meaning the data subject could still be at risk of identity fraud.

“Employing a regular shredding service removes this risk and gives businesses of all sizes peace of mind that they’re adhering to the new laws,” Jonathan added. “The size of the fines they’re avoiding by securely destroying confidential information far outweighs the cost of such services.

“And while recruiters often tell unsuccessful candidates: ‘We’ll keep your details on file,’ in future they’d be wise to rephrase this message.”

Rebecca joined the HRreview editorial team in January 2016. After graduating from the University of Sheffield Hallam in 2013 with a BA in English Literature, Rebecca has spent five years working in print and online journalism in Manchester and London. In the past she has been part of the editorial teams at Sleeper and Dezeen and has founded her own arts collective.

Latest news

Transgender staff excluded from single-sex toilets under new equality guidance

Transgender people must be excluded from single-sex toilets and changing rooms that correspond with their lived gender under updated...

Simon Coker: Closing the emotional gap – why AI in the workplace is as much a human challenge as a technological one

AI adoption is transforming how work gets done across every sector. But its deeper impact is less visible: it is reshaping how people feel about their work.

Employment tribunal delays stretch towards 2030 as lawyers warn system is nearing collapse

Employment tribunal hearings are being delayed for years as lawyers warn mounting backlogs are undermining workplace justice.

Keeping culture and purpose at the centre of a growing fintech

A fintech people leader explains how culture, wellbeing and purpose are being protected during rapid business growth.
- Advertisement -

Migrant worker with no right to work in UK wins discrimination case against employer

An employment tribunal has ruled that a migrant worker without the legal right to work in Britain can still pursue successful discrimination claims.

Government to replace some GP sick notes with return-to-work plans

Workers in four English regions will be directed towards personalised health and employment support as ministers test alternatives to GP-issued fit notes.

Must read

Olivia Buckle-Wright: Rescue your company strategy with the ladder of belief

Have you made it to the top of the...

Danielle Ingram: Augmented reality – a new approach to reward communication

How can we meet the needs of two diverse audiences in our employee communities: the younger "millennials" with their reliance on interactive mobile technology, and baby boomers whose preferences are often founded in traditional media?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you