England would crash out in second round of inequality World Cup

-

england flag logo

World leaders need to do more to ensure a level playing field between rich and poor, Oxfam said  as it published a World Cup wall chart showing how the 32 countries who have qualified fare on inequality.

Belgium (ranked 12th best team in the world by FIFA) would win the World Cup for having the smallest gap between rich and poor, beating Germany (FIFA rank 2) in the final. England would put in a disappointing performance, going out with an embarrassing defeat to Japan in the second round.

Oxfam’s Ricardo Fuentes-Nieva said: “In our World Cup, England pay the penalty for successive governments’ failure to tackle the growing gap between rich and poor. We live in a country where the richest 10 per cent earn more than the bottom 40 per cent and five families between them own more than 12 million people.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“But this is not just an English disease; leaders around the world urgently need to agree a new goal to reduce inequality. That will require action to prevent a global elite rigging the economic rules of the game in their favour at the expense of the poor.”

An Oxfam report published earlier this year warned that the richest 85 people now own as much as the poorest half of the world’s population and that 70 percent of people live in countries where inequality has increased in the last 30 years.

Oxfam’s World Cup wallchart was calculated using the Palma ratio – a measure widely used by economists and academics to work out how income is distributed between rich and poor. Latin American countries came out with the biggest gap between the richest 10% of the population and the poorest 40%, earning themselves an inequality red card. Honduras, Colombia, Costa Rica, Chile and Argentina, as well as host nation Brazil, would all come bottom of their groups, despite the fact inequality has been reducing in the region over the last 10 years.

Eight Latin-Americans appear in the top 100 of the Forbes list of richest people in the world, with a combined wealth of over $180 billion. At the same time 164 million people in the region are living in poverty.

Ricardo Fuentes-Nieva said: “The levels of inequality in Latin America are staggering and despite some significant progress over recent years it continues to be among the most unequal regions in the world. The rules of the game in these countries still largely work in favour of the richest – and therefore the most powerful citizens.

“But Latin America is starting to head in the right direction and is the only region in the world where income inequality is actually reducing. If the world continues on its current inequality path this wallchart could look very different in four years time.”

Russia and Ghana would also earn themselves a red card on inequality, whilst USA, Nigeria, Mexico, Algeria, Uruguay, Ecuador, Australia and Cote D’Ivoire would all get a yellow card for finishing third in their groups.

Favourites to win the 2014 FIFA World Cup, Spain, would lose in the semi-finals to Japan. They are equally matched on the Palma scale but are knocked out on ‘penalties’ as they lag behind Japan on other indices including: poverty rates, corruption and health and education indicators.

Ricardo Fuentes-Nieva said: “In all nations, high levels of inequality are offending people’s sense of fair play. Watching people with extreme wealth get even richer is a kick in the teeth for the world’s poorest and it’s time to blow the whistle on policies which contribute to the widening gap between the richest and the rest.”

Oxfam is calling on all governments to tackle inequality by cracking down on financial secrecy and tax dodging, by investing in universal education and healthcare, and by introducing a global goal to end extreme inequality in every country.

A recent survey from 40 countries found that 85% of people thought inequality was too high, and over 70% thought that it was their government’s responsibility to reduce it.

Latest news

Exclusive: London bus drivers’ ‘dignity’ at risk as strikes loom over welfare concerns

London bus drivers raise concerns over fatigue and lack of facilities as potential strikes escalate long-standing welfare issues.

Whistleblowing reports ‘surge by up to 250 percent’ at councils as new rights take effect

Whistleblowing cases are rising across UK councils as stronger workplace protections come into force, though concerns remain about underreporting of serious issues.

Bullying and harassment to become regulatory breaches under new FCA rules

New rules will bring bullying and harassment into regulatory scope, as firms face rising reports of workplace misconduct.

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.
- Advertisement -

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Must read

Kerry McGreavy: Why apprenticeships are the future

Find out why apprenticeships are the future from someone who knows first-hand. Being an apprentice gave me the option to study part-time while working, with training tailored exactly to my job, says Coventry University’s Head of Apprenticeships, Kerry McGreavy.  

Tom Kerr Williams: Managing strike action

Most employers look to avoid industrial strike action wherever possible, but there comes a time in every unionised employer’s existence where such action is threatened.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you