Relaxing COVID-19 work rules will cause new stress points for employers, warn lawyers

-

This analysis comes as the majority of COVID-19 restrictions have been removed in England from today (19th July). 

From today (Monday 19th July), most legal COVID-19 restrictions have been lifted in England.

In line with the 4th and final stage of the Government’s roadmap, this includes the removal of social distancing and lifting the order to work from home where possible.

However, lawyers from Royds Withy King have warned this has put employers in a difficult position.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Employers will now be expected to make their own decisions concerning how and when to bring staff back into the office and how to manage employees who have different views about safety, mask-wearing and remote working.

Kate Benefer, a Partner in the Employment Law team at Royds Withy King, discussed the potential problems which could arise:

The Government has passed onto employers the responsibility for deciding what measures are necessary to ensure a safe workplace. Whilst the easing of restrictions will be welcomed by businesses, it will inevitably create further confusion and potential points of conflict in the workplace.

Employees and employers may, for example, have different perspectives of risk and what is safe, and that will be difficult to manage. Businesses have an obligation to carry out a risk assessment, but this is difficult when there are still many unknowns with COVID.

Ms. Benefer also explained that the risk of discrimination claims could also spike if employers do not handle the return to the office mindfully:

Employers need to be particularly careful with employees who indicate they are not comfortable with a return to the workplace.

There could be health concerns that mean an employee is particularly vulnerable in relation to COVID, or mental health issues, such as anxiety, which may have been caused or exacerbated by the pandemic. Employers who refuse the right to continue to work from home may find themselves facing discrimination claims.

As such, Ms. Benefer encouraged employers to carry out the following tasks as they map out their HR strategy for the coming months:

  • Carrying out a workplace assessment looking at what measures can be adopted to minimise the risk of COVID infections.
  • Asking why you need to bring employees back into the workplace so that you can explain and ‘sell’ the idea to staff as well as being prepared to respond to flexible working requests.
  • Communicating plans with staff as early as possible, addressing any concerns and try and bring them on board.
  • Adopting a common-sense approach to face coverings and flexible working.
  • Considering individual circumstances and make adjustments to accommodate employees who may have health concerns.

This, Kate stated, could avoid creating a two-tier workforce which could “lead to resentment and allegations over favourable treatment, particularly if promotions or allocations of work are perceived to be unfair”.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Mark Kaye: What does the implementation of Plan B mean for employers? 

In light of Plan B restrictions, employers should avoid blanket policies, writes Mark Kaye,  instead the circumstances that apply to each employee should be properly considered. 

HMRC steps up its campaign against personal service companies

A new consultation document heralds a reform to the taxation of contractors working through personal service companies, writes Elizabeth Middleton of law firm Cripps.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you