Period given to employers to admit to ‘furlough fraud’ tripled by HMRC

-

Period given to employers to admit to 'furlough fraud' tripled by HMRC

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) have announced that companies who have committed ‘furlough fraud’ now have 90 instead of 30 days to confess what they have done, as there is a belief that businesses that have taken advantage of the scheme have done so accidentally.

This amnesty has been introduced via the Finance Bill which received royal assent on 22/07/20. There has been a rise in the amount of ‘furlough fraud’ reported but professionals are questioning whether all these cases were done intentionally.

Matthew Sharp, senior associate at law firm Fieldfisher believes that due to the lack of understanding surrounding the furlough scheme, employers were likely to make mistakes. Mr Sharp said:

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

If we go back to when the furlough scheme was first launched, employers were encouraged to make use of this ‘pay now’ scheme to prevent mass redundancies. However, the ‘check later’ element and what HMRC enforcement would look like was never really clarified.

As the ‘check later’ portion of the furlough scheme becomes the new focus for the Government, we are likely to see more reports of furlough fraud as employers start to increase checks to ensure they were compliant.

HMRC received 6,749 reports of ‘furlough fraud’ as of 22/07/20 which is up from 4,400 at the end of June.

On 26/06/20 Philip Pepper, head of employment and partner at the law firm, Shakespeare Martineau gave tips on how employers can avoid committing accidental ‘furlough fraud’.

Still, there are businesses that have committed fraud on purpose. As Andy Wallis, partner in the corporate tax team at Kreston Reeves a business and financial advisers firm said:

The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme has been a lifeline for many businesses, yet there is increasing evidence that it is being abused, for example, by employers asking staff to work whilst on furlough. Whilst it is clear that this is wrong, businesses may easily find that they have inadvertently breached the rules as little guidance was available when the first claims were being submitted.

HMRC has a duty to investigate where it believes fraudulent activity is happening, so it is not surprising that investigations are already underway.

The Finance Act introduces a 90-day amnesty that puts the onus on businesses to notify HMRC of any overclaim. Businesses that do not notify will be treated as deliberately concealing overpayments from HMRC and can attract penalties of up to 100% of the amount overclaimed.

HMRC is sending a clear message to businesses – take advantage of this amnesty or face investigation. It is clear that HMRC hopes its amnesty will raise significant revenues.

It is vitally important that businesses keep good and clear records of staff on furlough, particularly as it is now possible to allow staff to return part-time. Businesses should also be able to demonstrate clear communication to staff on furlough that explains the rules.

Darius is the editor of HRreview. He has previously worked as a finance reporter for the Daily Express. He studied his journalism masters at Press Association Training and graduated from the University of York with a degree in History.

Latest news

Sustainable business starts with people, not HR policies

Why long-term success depends on supporting employees, not just meeting ESG targets, with practical steps for leaders to build healthier organisations.

Hiring steadies but Gulf crisis threatens recovery in UK jobs market

UK hiring shows signs of stabilising, but rising global uncertainty linked to the Gulf crisis is weighing on employer confidence and delaying recovery.

Women ‘face career setback’ risk with flexible working

Female staff using remote or reduced-hour arrangements more likely to move into lower-status roles, raising concerns about bias in career progression.

Jo Kansagra: Make work benefits work for Gen Z

Gen Z employees are entering the workforce at full steam, and yet many workplace benefits schemes are firmly stuck in the past.
- Advertisement -

Union access plans risk straining workplace relations, CIPD warns

Proposed rules on workplace access raise concerns about employer readiness and operational strain.

Petra Wilton on managers struggling with new workplace laws

“Managers are not being given the tools they need to fully understand how the rules of the workplace are changing.”

Must read

Emily Rose McRae: HR leadership at a crossroads: Is it time to explore or restore work practices?

While the world of work continues to change, many senior HR professionals remain undecided about how best to adapt, says Emily Rose McRae.

Matthew Connell: Bridging the work vs education divide

What are the best ways to cope with some of the challenges of transitioning from education to work? Matthew Connell talks to us about education and employment.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you