Period given to employers to admit to ‘furlough fraud’ tripled by HMRC

-

Period given to employers to admit to 'furlough fraud' tripled by HMRC

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) have announced that companies who have committed ‘furlough fraud’ now have 90 instead of 30 days to confess what they have done, as there is a belief that businesses that have taken advantage of the scheme have done so accidentally.

This amnesty has been introduced via the Finance Bill which received royal assent on 22/07/20. There has been a rise in the amount of ‘furlough fraud’ reported but professionals are questioning whether all these cases were done intentionally.

Matthew Sharp, senior associate at law firm Fieldfisher believes that due to the lack of understanding surrounding the furlough scheme, employers were likely to make mistakes. Mr Sharp said:

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

If we go back to when the furlough scheme was first launched, employers were encouraged to make use of this ‘pay now’ scheme to prevent mass redundancies. However, the ‘check later’ element and what HMRC enforcement would look like was never really clarified.

As the ‘check later’ portion of the furlough scheme becomes the new focus for the Government, we are likely to see more reports of furlough fraud as employers start to increase checks to ensure they were compliant.

HMRC received 6,749 reports of ‘furlough fraud’ as of 22/07/20 which is up from 4,400 at the end of June.

On 26/06/20 Philip Pepper, head of employment and partner at the law firm, Shakespeare Martineau gave tips on how employers can avoid committing accidental ‘furlough fraud’.

Still, there are businesses that have committed fraud on purpose. As Andy Wallis, partner in the corporate tax team at Kreston Reeves a business and financial advisers firm said:

The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme has been a lifeline for many businesses, yet there is increasing evidence that it is being abused, for example, by employers asking staff to work whilst on furlough. Whilst it is clear that this is wrong, businesses may easily find that they have inadvertently breached the rules as little guidance was available when the first claims were being submitted.

HMRC has a duty to investigate where it believes fraudulent activity is happening, so it is not surprising that investigations are already underway.

The Finance Act introduces a 90-day amnesty that puts the onus on businesses to notify HMRC of any overclaim. Businesses that do not notify will be treated as deliberately concealing overpayments from HMRC and can attract penalties of up to 100% of the amount overclaimed.

HMRC is sending a clear message to businesses – take advantage of this amnesty or face investigation. It is clear that HMRC hopes its amnesty will raise significant revenues.

It is vitally important that businesses keep good and clear records of staff on furlough, particularly as it is now possible to allow staff to return part-time. Businesses should also be able to demonstrate clear communication to staff on furlough that explains the rules.

Darius is the editor of HRreview. He has previously worked as a finance reporter for the Daily Express. He studied his journalism masters at Press Association Training and graduated from the University of York with a degree in History.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Darren Timmins: Retaining high performers in 2015

With a third of all workers in the UK looking to move jobs, how can you keep your talent committed?

Back to nature: how businesses can exploit the benefits of biophilic design

For many, office plants may be the first thing that spring to mind on hearing the phrase ‘biophilic design’. However, in reality, this nature-inspired trend can be implemented far more subtly and in a variety of different ways
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you