Using software to monitor staff working from home: is this acceptable?

-

Software companies that track staff working from home have all reported a significant increase in their business as remote working has become the ‘new normal’ during the global pandemic. 

With the rise of working from home, an increasing amount of companies have opted to track employees’ work using software. Hubstaff has said that, since February, their amount of UK customers have quadrupled from its typical year-on-year figures. Similarly, ActivTrak reported seeing a tripling of sales requests and license increases from current customers. Due to this rising trend, HRreview has asked the experts whether this is acceptable – from a legal standpoint and for the professional relationship between employers and employees.

Sally Mewies, head of technology at law firm Walker Morris, encourages employers to err on the side of caution:

Data protection laws detail certain checks and balances that an employer will need to carry out, including; a detailed assessment of the impact on the individual’s privacy as a result of the monitoring, and a balancing of the interests of the employer against those of the employee.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Even when employers are satisfied that the monitoring is both justified and lawful, they will need to update privacy notices and policies and ensure that the employees are made aware in an open and transparent way about the undertaking of the monitoring.

Alan Price, employment law expert and CEO of BrightHR, offers an alternative to tracking employees:

Technically, it is legal for employers to monitor computer usage of their employees to keep track of productivity and protect legitimate businesses interests. However, employees may feel untrusted by management, especially if they are getting work done and there have never been any issues with their productivity in the past. This could if poorly managed, be very damaging to the overall employment relationship.

Instead, it may be better to explore other options. For example, remote employees could be given clear targets to work towards during the day and asked to justify why these have not been met. If management is not satisfied with these explanations, they could then seek to take further action against these employees.

Robert Ordever, managing director of workplace culture consultancy, O.C. Tanner Europe, strongly advises against tracking employees:
Any employer that requires tracking software to assess productivity, has much bigger problems than productivity. The leaders should instead focus on creating a culture of trust, empowerment and collaboration in which there is a greater purpose that connects everyone towards a common goal. And there needs to be ongoing recognition so that those performing well are ‘called out’ and rewarded, encouraging positive behaviours to be repeated. This then creates a desire to do well rather than a fear of simply being ‘inactive’.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Curtis Holmes: Payroll is the driver for employee engagement

Payroll has long been treated as a back-office necessity: essential, but not something that shapes culture or drives engagement. This no longer stands.

Labour market yet to show major AI impact on jobs, govt adviser says

A government economic adviser has challenged predictions of widespread AI-driven unemployment, arguing labour market data has yet to show disruption.

Young workers ‘pressured into signing NDAs after workplace injuries’

Workers say injuries are being hidden behind confidentiality agreements while financial pressures leave many afraid to challenge unsafe conditions.

CIPD recognises 30 HR leaders driving change across UK workplaces

The CIPD has unveiled its HR30 list for 2026, recognising senior people leaders whose work has delivered measurable impact across organisations and workforces.
- Advertisement -

Brits dream of being their own boss, but still cling to the monthly pay cheque, survey reveals

Britons say they like the idea of self-employment, but most still value the security and stability of traditional jobs.

AI Coaching Won’t Replace Managers. It Will Expose Coaching Debt.

As AI coaching expands, employers may gain a clearer view of where manager support is falling short.

Must read

Fiona Young: How EAs are redefining their roles with AI & automation

Executive Assistants (EAs) are on the brink of a huge shift, as AI is rewriting the rulebook for what it means to be an EA.

2015 graduates have more jobs to choose from than last year

According to new research from job search engine Adzuna, the class of 2015 graduates have 16 percent more jobs to choose from than last year, although advertised salaries have fallen to their lowest in ten months
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you