Low-paid workers lose workplace satisfaction premium over high earners

-

In a new report which reflects on the changing world of work over the past 30 years, low-earners were found to have lost their job satisfaction premium over this period.

The job satisfaction premium that low-earners used to enjoy in the early 1990s, with around three-quarters of staff reporting this, has now deteriorated, new research from the Resolution Foundations find.

Instead, job satisfaction has fallen for both high and low earners over the last 30 years, levelling down to just under 60 per cent for both groups.

This is thought to be driven by rising levels of stress, work intensity and falling levels of control over work.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In particular, the number of employees who report working at a very high speed for most of the time has doubled between 1992 and 2017, rising from 23 per cent to 45 per cent.

As a result, almost a third of workers – especially female employees – report feeling “used up at the end of the day”, leading to concerns about burnout and mental health issues.

Low-earners in particular were shown to have less of a say over the decisions which change how their work is done as numbers fell from 44 to 27 per cent between 1992 and 2017.

Despite this, various positive outcomes have emerged over the past decades.

The proportion of employees who say their work is helpful to others has increased from two-thirds (67 per cent) in 1989 to close to four-fifths (79 per cent) by 2017, suggesting staff are now finding more fulfilment in the roles they carry out.

Additionally, a rising number of people have identified their job as offering prospects for advancement and over four-fifths (up from 77 to 86 per cent between 1992 and 2017) feel proud of where they work.

The Resolution Foundation has urged businesses to measure the impact of workplace shifts – driven by COVID-19, Brexit and rising automation – through workers’ job satisfaction and wellbeing in addition to pay and productivity.

It adds that policy makers must address issues for low earners beyond the minimum wage, such as the lack of control over the work they do, and that firms looking for productivity gains are unlikely to find them by simply driving their workers even harder.

Krishan Shah, Researcher at the Resolution Foundation, said:

The world of work has changed completely over the past 30 years – from the decline of manufacturing to the growing use of computers, as well as new HR and management practises.

However, work has also become more intense and stressful in recent decades, particularly for Britain’s low earners. This has had a ‘levelling down’ effect across Britain’s workplaces, with low earners losing the ‘job satisfaction premium’ they once enjoyed over higher paid staff.

As Britain edges towards a post-pandemic economy, we need to focus more on these wider measures of job satisfaction if we’re to boost workers’ well-being, as well as their pay. Low earners in particular need to have a greater say over the work they do.


*These findings have been outlined in the Resolution Foundation’s ‘Work Experiences: Changes in the Subjective Experience of Work’.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Jo Kansagra: Make work benefits work for Gen Z

Gen Z employees are entering the workforce at full steam, and yet many workplace benefits schemes are firmly stuck in the past.

Union access plans risk straining workplace relations, CIPD warns

Proposed rules on workplace access raise concerns about employer readiness and operational strain.

Petra Wilton on managers struggling with new workplace laws

“Managers are not being given the tools they need to fully understand how the rules of the workplace are changing.”

Succession planning gaps ‘leave firms scrambling for senior HR talent’

UK firms risk leadership gaps as few prepare future HR leaders, leaving businesses reliant on reactive hiring and a limited talent pipeline.
- Advertisement -

Stephen Simpson: The first six months – why probation needs a rethink under the new unfair dismissal rules

Changes coming into effect through the Employment Rights Act in 2026 and 2027 mean that businesses will need to rethink how they recruit and manage employees.

City law firm faces claims of bullying and misconduct at senior level

Allegations at a major legal practice raise questions about leadership accountability and how workplace complaints are handled.

Must read

Anita Ibrahim: 5 reasons why you shouldn’t use your apprenticeship levy

To mark National Apprenticeship Week, Arch's Anita Ibrahim discusses the five reasons you shouldn't use your apprenticeship levy.

Susanna Gilmartin & Carmina Campion: Govt guidance on BYOD – what you need to know

Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) describes the practice and...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you