L&G vow to vote against FTSE 100 if they do not hire a BAME board member

-

Legal & General (L&G), a leading financial services company, has demanded that all FTSE-100 companies must have a BAME (Black, Asian, Minority Ethnic) director by 2022.

L&G has announced that they are calling on all FTSE 100 companies and S&P 500 in the US to appoint a non-white director by 2022. If it does not meet this deadline, it has vowed to vote against the re-appointment of the national committee chairman from the 30 plus firms that have all-white boards. HRreview has previously reported on the CBI calling on the FTSE 100 to appoint at least one non-white member at board level by 2021. 

This is a significant move as L&G manages £1.2 trillion worth of pension funds which means it owns up to 3 per cent of every British blue-chip company.

According to a report published by L&G, over half (52 per cent) of FTSE 100 companies have all caucasian boards. It also stated that 37 per cent of firms in the S&P 500 also have all-white boards.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

L&G stated that the company chose to make this decision after the murder of George Floyd in the US, writing:

The horrifying killing of George Floyd and so many others has led many institutional investors to think much more seriously about structural racism and inequality.

We have been longstanding advocates for cognitive diversity in the companies in which we invest, and have spent a lot of time improving the gender balance of those companies, through both engagement and voting, with great success in the UK and in the US.

Our expectation is that companies set ambitions related to the ethnic composition of their organisation, throughout the workforce, with a particular emphasis at the board level, which generally sets the tone from the top.

For companies that fail to meet our transparent and rules-based minimum expectations, there will be voting and investment consequences.

We focus on the board, as this is where accountability for the issue belongs, and where we can have most influence as we are able to elect board members annually.

 

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Curtis Holmes: Payroll is the driver for employee engagement

Payroll has long been treated as a back-office necessity: essential, but not something that shapes culture or drives engagement. This no longer stands.

Labour market yet to show major AI impact on jobs, govt adviser says

A government economic adviser has challenged predictions of widespread AI-driven unemployment, arguing labour market data has yet to show disruption.

Young workers ‘pressured into signing NDAs after workplace injuries’

Workers say injuries are being hidden behind confidentiality agreements while financial pressures leave many afraid to challenge unsafe conditions.

CIPD recognises 30 HR leaders driving change across UK workplaces

The CIPD has unveiled its HR30 list for 2026, recognising senior people leaders whose work has delivered measurable impact across organisations and workforces.
- Advertisement -

Brits dream of being their own boss, but still cling to the monthly pay cheque, survey reveals

Britons say they like the idea of self-employment, but most still value the security and stability of traditional jobs.

AI Coaching Won’t Replace Managers. It Will Expose Coaching Debt.

As AI coaching expands, employers may gain a clearer view of where manager support is falling short.

Must read

Mark Pinches & Euan Laurence: How can we manage stress in the run-up to Christmas?

How can we manage seasonal stress?

David Coleman: Engagement – Fake it and it will run away

Staff engagement has become a popular boardroom topic, particularly as its influence on performance improvement and competitive advantage are now so clear. It is well known, through studies such as the McLeod report, that highly engaged teams significantly outperform their less engaged counterparts. Some of the numbers are more than eye-opening, especially as they pertain to core metrics that determine any business’s success.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you