HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Weekday HR updates. Unsubscribe anytime.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

How employers are missing the mark with employee benefits

-

How employers are missing the mark with employee benefits

Almost half of employers do not measure how useful their benefits are to staff.

According to new research by Group Risk Development (GRiD), the group risk protection industry body, 42 per cent of companies do not measure staff appreciation of benefits.

Typically, benefits that are offered to staff include perks such as gym memberships, free food and beverages in the office, health insurance, and dental plans.

 

HRreview Logo

Get our essential daily HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Weekday HR updates. Unsubscribe anytime.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

 

However, GriD insists that companies which are failing to measure staff reaction to these benefits are “missing a trick” as they are disregarding a vital tool for recruiting new staff and retaining valued employees.

The advantages of measuring staff appreciation give employers insight, this shows which benefits are understood and if they have any value for the employee. As well as making staff feel engaged and more appreciative towards the benefits that they do receive.

Considering the amount of time and resources that are used to offer benefits to staff, GRiD believes it is in the employer’s best interest to figure out which benefits are relevant and valued, both to the workforce overall and also to specific demographics.

Additionally, asking staff which benefits they like and use will make them feel listened to. Not only this but statistics show that asking these questions leads to greater staff appreciation of the benefits offered. Of the companies that do measure staff appreciation, over half (55 per cent) believe that their staff do value the benefits offered. Conversely, of those companies who do not measure staff appreciation of benefits, only a quarter (25 per cent) believe that staff value the benefits offered.

According to research by Gallagher, a global insurance consulting services firm, despite 72 per cent of UK organisations expressing their intention to enhance the benefits they are offering, only one fifth (20 per cent) of organisations allow their workforce to customise their individual benefit packages. Gallagher’s report states that employers should “trust and empower employees to make decisions that are right for them, their team and their work.”

Nick Burns, CEO at Gallagher’s employee benefits consulting division, UK, said:

It’s long been accepted that the brand experience an organisation creates — the way it looks, feels and acts on the outside — is vital to attracting new business. A shift that many don’t yet recognise is how it looks, feels and acts on the inside is now just as important.

Katharine Moxham, spokesperson for GRiD, said:

The more that companies understand which benefits resonate with their staff, the easier it is for them to make decisions about future benefits.

When employers don’t measure how much their benefits are valued, they’re only really doing half a job. Offering them is one thing, but it’s crucial that employers know which ones are adding value to their company.

Understanding what staff need is key to ensuring that what’s offered is relevant.

We’d also encourage employers to talk to their advisers about help they can give in this area. Advisers see it as important that the benefits they recommend are appreciated and being utilised by employees. They often have tried-and-tested ways to help employers with the seemingly onerous task of investigating the relevance of benefits.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Tina Benson: Why well-meaning team activities fall short

Without inclusive and considered planning, team activities risk reinforcing the very divides they are intended to address.

‘Great Steal’: TUC rallies workers to defend Employment Rights Act

Campaign against proposed repeal of Act attracts more than 23,000 signatures as unions warn workplace protections could be weakened.

Jon Holt on the UK jobs market

"Jobs market is showing its strongest signs ​of improvement in three years."

Warning over lack of manager training to support neurodivergent staff

Many managers lack training to support neurodivergent employees, with new polling suggesting workplace awareness and confidence remain limited.
- Advertisement -

Grant Wyatt: Your boss isn’t the problem – your expectations are

For decades, the corporate world has chased a seductive idea: that better leadership will fix everything. It sounds reasonable. It is also flawed. 

GPs say it’s ‘not worth the grief’ to refuse mental health sick notes

Most GPs say they rarely refuse sick notes for mental health issues, as employers face rising absence and debate grows over reforming the fit note system.

Must read

Dorothy Dalton: HR – The pink function

A request for a gender balanced short list usually...

Chris White: How can HR revolutionise performance management?

Performance management done right can unlock vast swathes of potential among employees, says Chris White.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you