Higher-earning women more likely to reduce paid work after childbirth than male partners

-

Research shows that mothers who have a higher salary within the household pre-childbirth are still more frequently leaving the workplace after having a child, in comparison to their male partners.

A new analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) shows that women who earn more than their male partner are still more likely to leave their paid employment or cut their hours after childbirth.

According to research cited, gender pay gaps are usually driven by pre-existing gaps in earnings within opposite-gender couples – since men already earn more than women, on average, even before they have children – which then drives decisions around who reduces paid work once children are born.

However, this new research shows that mothers are still more likely to reduce paid work in some form even when she has the higher rate of pay which is the case for almost two-fifths of heterosexual couples (38 per cent).

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In this scenario, mothers who earn a higher salary are four times more likely (13 per cent) than their male partner (3 per cent) to leave the workforce after having children.

In addition, when women do choose to stay in the workforce after giving birth, their working hours fall by over a quarter (26 per cent). The research finds that there is little to no reduction in the number of paid hours that men work after having a child – including when they earn less than their female partner.

The report ultimately highlights that childbirth greatly impacts the evolution of gender differences in careers over the life cycle. Women’s employment rates jump sharply down from about 90 per cent to 75 per cent, and average weekly hours of work for those still in paid work fall from around 40 to less than 30.

In cases where women earn less than their male partners prior to giving birth, mothers’ employment rates for paid work falls by 22 per cent whilst the hours of paid work falls by a third (33 per cent).

Alison Andrew, a Senior Research Economist at IFS and an author of the report, said:

The gendered roles of men and women in paid work and childcare after heterosexual couples start families play a crucial part in the development of the gender pay gap, and gender differences in careers more generally.

How these parents divide up paid work and childcare cannot be straightforwardly explained by (smaller) pre-existing differences in their career trajectories. Even where the mother was the main earner before having a child, she is much more likely to give up work or reduce her hours after becoming a parent than is the father.

So the roots of these gender differences cannot all be traced back to which parent was in the better position, career-wise, to be the primary breadwinner. Attempts to understand and address gender pay gaps must consider the role of social norms and maternity and paternity policies – and the links between the two – in driving men’s and women’s roles after childbirth.


*This research was obtained from an IFS report entitled “The Careers and Time Use of Mothers and Fathers” which analyses why the number of women in paid employment falls after giving birth.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Virginia Holden: Why C-suite leaders are misusing AI – and how it’s putting businesses at risk

Current AI policies largely focus downward: staff misuse, data leakage, unauthorised tools. Yet accountability frameworks sits with leadership.

Jo Stubbs: Creating a disability-confident workplace

How can we create disability-confident workplaces? Jo Stubbs discusses what HR professionals need to know and why disability-confident workplaces are good for business
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you