Female applicants excluded by gendered job adverts

-

New research has found that despite job vacancies being on the rise, women are being locked out of the labour market because of gendered job adverts.

The study from Applied, a hiring platform that debiases recruitment, has shown that women are being alienated by job descriptions that discourage them from applying, with masculine wording reducing the number of female applicants by as much as 10 per cent.

This comes as pressure from the pandemic has already seen women re-enter the workforce at less than half the rate of men, despite job vacancies topping one million as the economy recovers from COVID-19.

Many attribute this slow rate of re-entry to reasons such as school closures and home-schooling, as these factors disproportionately affect women.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In order to obtain this research, Applied analysed job adverts and ran each through a ‘gender score calculator’, and placed the language from the advert on a scale from ‘strongly feminine’ through to ‘strongly masculine.

In relation to job adverts that were categorised as ‘strongly masculine’, the number of female candidates applying to the role plummeted, dropping by up to 10 per cent.

In fact, only 44 per cent of applications for roles advertised as using ‘strongly masculine’ language came from female candidates.

The impact of feminine-coded language, such as ‘share’, ‘responsibility’, or ‘together’, was compared to the impact of masculine words, such as ‘challenging’, ‘driven’, and ‘individual’.

Shockingly, the study found that if an advert used feminine-coded or ‘neutral’ words, the proportion of female applicants had the potential to increase up to 54 per cent.

Furthermore, if a job advert used feminine or neutral language, a woman was more likely to not only apply, but was more likely to be offered the job.

Job adverts that featured masculine language were much more likely to have a man as the successful candidate.

Khyati Sundaram, CEO of Applied, commented:

Gendered language can be difficult to spot, as it’s so ingrained in the way we talk about certain employability characteristics, leadership skills and industries. But this research evidences the real-time impact gendered language is having on the workforce.

In order to level the playing fields and get applications from qualified women on the table, employers have a responsibility to neutralise the masculine language they’re using.

For employers, this new research provides a fresh incentive to assess job applications for gendered language in order to attract a diverse pool of applicants and support female talent.


*In order to obtain this reserch, Applied analysed a sample of 7563 closed or archived jobs to find out how many people from each gender category applied.

Megan McElroy is a second year English Literature student at the University of Warwick. As Editorial Intern for HRreview, her interests include employment law and public policy. In relation to her degree, her favourite areas of study include Small Press Publishing and political poetry.

Latest news

Superdry co-founder’s victim warns workplace power can silence abuse victims

A survivor's account raises questions about speaking-up cultures and accountability in organisations.

UK’s always-on work culture ‘driving employee burnout’

Nearly half of UK workers say they end most working days mentally exhausted as rising workplace pressure leaves employees and managers struggling to switch off.

Andrew Murray on why no two days look alike

A people development leader shares how travel, training and a passion for helping others shape a working day with little room for routine.

Lucy Standing: Older workers are back in the centre of the hiring debate – ready to lead the response?

For HR leaders, the argument is simple: the people being filtered out of your hiring process are not past their best.
- Advertisement -

One in 10 women quit work after pregnancy loss, report finds

Research suggests inconsistent workplace support following pregnancy loss and maternity leave is contributing to resignations and poorer mental wellbeing.

Fear of becoming obsolete grips workers as AI reshapes careers

More than two in five workers worry their skills could become outdated as AI reshapes hiring demands and increases pressure to keep learning.

Must read

Ksenia Zheltoukhova: The rise of the versatile recruiter

Ksenia Zheltoukhova Research Associate at CIPD Despite high unemployment it...

Ronnie Tong: Will changing employee contracts save you money?

The national living wage has made headlines for several weeks but not always for the right reasons. What was meant to be a positive move by the government, has resulted in negative publicity for some organisations which have responded by changing employee contracts to try and save money.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you