Worker injured due to serious health and safty failngs at factory

-

An employee working on a laminator producing absorbent pads for meat packaging was severely injured when he was pulled into the machine by giant rollers.

The worker who had been working for Elliott Absorbent Products Ltd, based in Deansgate in Manchester suffered severe friction burns to his arms, chest and stomach and will now undergo skin grafts to both his arms to rebuild on the damaged areas.

The incident may have been prevented if the Infa red sensors, which were designed to halt operation when someone approached the rollers had not been swithched off. The company which supplies major supermarket chains across Europe, had shut off the sensor because paper dust generated by the machine had been triggering it.

Elliott Absorbent Products Ltd, of Deansgate in Manchester, pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 11(1) of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998. The company was ordered to pay costs of £4,389 in addition to the fine at Manchester Crown Court on 7 January.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Sarah Taylor, the investigating inspector at HSE, said:
“Sadly a worker has suffered permanent scarring because Elliotts didn’t do enough to look after the safety of its workers.

“The three enforcement notices HSE served following a visit to the company’s Rochdale factory in 2008 should have acted as a wake-up call to check the guards on all its machines.

“But the infra-red sensor on the machine at the company’s Littleborough factory was disabled without considering why it was there in the first place – to prevent workers being injured.”

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Michael Bronstein: TUPE transfers and outsourcing – a meaty question

The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (TUPE) continue to generate difficult questions, more than 35 years after they were originally introduced in 1981.

Ronnie Tong: Will changing employee contracts save you money?

The national living wage has made headlines for several weeks but not always for the right reasons. What was meant to be a positive move by the government, has resulted in negative publicity for some organisations which have responded by changing employee contracts to try and save money.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you