HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Caroline Essex: Social networking – private joke or public insult?

-

How many times have you, or someone you know, decided to take out some of the day’s frustrations on Facebook? Well, you are not the only one.

In 2008 a group of cabin crew branded their passengers “chavs” on Facebook. In 2009 a woman known only as “Lindsay” posted – “OMG I hate my job! My boss is a total pervy w***er always making me do s*** stuff just to p*** me off!” In 2010 a TUI worker called her colleague “a brown-nosing cow.” And only last month, bank worker Stephanie Bon posted “New CEO gets £4,000 an hour. I get £7. That’s fair”.

A further case from earlier this year involved a shift manager at Wetherspoons in Cheshire who was subjected to verbal and physical threats by a group of customers. Unable to contact her manger who was on holiday, the frustrated employee posted about the abuse on Facebook. Unfortunately those making the threats managed to read the posts, one of which called the customer a “fu**ing moaning old hag”.

What do all these disgruntled employees now have in common? That’s right, not one of them is still employed by the employer they complained about (however, a spokesperson for the bank that employed Stephanie Bon has said that Stephanie’s departure from the bank had nothing to do with Facebook, but was because she was a short term worker whose services were no longer needed.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Nevertheless, these incidents highlight the difficult relationship between social networking sites and the employment relationship. Employees would no doubt argue that a Facebook post is similar in nature to a private, out-of-hours chat with a close friend over a cup of coffee and therefore nothing to do with their employment.

However, many employers feel differently. Most social networking sites (be it Facebook, Twitter, or something entirely different) are not private – your wall posts can be seen by all your “friends” and, if your privacy settings are not high enough, by complete strangers as well.

In some cases, the alleged misconduct on the part of the employee may seem more obviously unacceptable – for example, if an employee was found to be posting highly confidential information on their Twitter feed, many people may agree that some form of disciplinary action is reasonable. But can the same really be said for someone posting a personal, albeit, uncomplimentary, opinion? Does a public expression of a dislike for your boss really amount to gross misconduct?

But it’s not just employees who are having their say on Facebook. Lindsay’s complaint about her boss (referred to above) resulted in the following post in response from her boss (who no doubt Lindsay had forgotten she had added as a friend): “Firstly, don’t flatter yourself. Secondly, you’ve worked here 5 months and didn’t work out that I’m gay? Thirdly, that ‘s**t stuff’ is called your ‘job'”. Lindsay was then informed not to return to work.

But what can employees do to try and protect themselves? First think about whether you really need to be Facebook friends with everyone in the office (those who you do befriend, but who you hardly know, will see everything that you write, and might not necessarily keep it to themselves); whether your privacy settings are high enough so that only friends can see your posts; and whether you really need to share that rant with all your friends and followers. You probably wouldn’t put up a poster advertising your feelings on the office notice board, so do you really want to do it on Facebook?

In order to avoid confusion over the status of social networking sites and information posted on them, it is important for employers to have a clear IT Policy, which highlights its expectations, and its employees’ responsibilities, in relation to posting on social media websites, both in and out of work. A clearly drafted policy, properly notified to all staff, will help to give the employers the conviction they need to take action if they feel that a member of staff has used a social networking site in such a way as to damage either the reputation of the business, or the working relationship between employer and employee.

Caroline‘s practice focuses on all aspects of employment law acting for both employers and employees on contentious matters such as unfair dismissal and discrimination claims, and non-contentious matter such as contract and policy drafting. Caroline is a member of the Employment Lawyers Association.

Her recent experiences include advising employees and employers on claims in the Employment Tribunal including unfair dismissal, age discrimination, race discrimination, disability discrimination and whistle blowing.

Caroline is also a member of the Employment Lawyers Association.

Latest news

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Employment tribunal roundup: Secondment status, dismissal reasoning and whistleblowing protections examined

EAT rulings clarify secondment status, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and whistleblowing protection, with practical lessons on process and legal thresholds.
- Advertisement -

Mental health cited in a third of sickness absence cases ahead of sick pay changes

Stress, anxiety and depression are driving a growing share of workplace absence as new sick pay rules expand eligibility from April.

Peter Dando: Why ‘salary sacrifice’ needs renaming

Salary sacrifice schemes are designed to help employees make smarter financial choices - but they remain widely misunderstood.

Must read

Richard Manby: Working from Home – A Blessing or a Curse?

The last 20 years has seen a dramatic growth in flexible working as employees and employers recognise that the benefits far outweigh the disadvantages. In fact, a recent ‘Job Exodus’ survey conducted by Investors In People found that 34% of employees would prefer flexible working to a 3% pay rise.

Matt Burr: Solving the digital learning paradox

Digital learning has a problem. Find a moment for an off-the-record chat with a seasoned investor, L&D professional, or entrepreneur and they’ll all admit the same basic issue: No one has figured out how to deliver high-quality learning experiences at scale.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you