Unison: We’ll see NHS in court

-

Legal action has been initiated by Unison against the Secretary of State for Health challenging his refusal to consult the public on proposals in his White Paper, Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS.

The proposals could bring the biggest changes to the operation of the National Health Service since its birth under Atlee’s Labour government.

The day after the White Paper was published, NHS Chief Executive Sir David Nicholson wrote to all NHS chief executives instructing them to begin the proposals “immediately”. The trade union wrote to Nicholson claiming this instruction was unlawful.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Nicholson said he would write again to NHS chief executives reminding them they should not implement the White Paper proposals until the consultation period had ended.

The union argued no steps should be taken to implement the changes in any way, until the public have had the opportunity to consider and comment on them.

But he said the consultation was limited to how the proposal should be implemented not on whether the proposal should be implemented – i.e. the public’s view on the White Paper proposals themselves was not being requested and would not be considered.

Unison’s head of health, Karen Jennings, said: “I find it incredible that the NHS Chief Executive would say he believes there is no legal duty on the Secretary of State to consult on the merits of the proposals in the White Paper.

“The White Paper contains sweeping changes to the NHS and how it should be run. The NHS Constitution enshrines the principle that the public, staff and unions have an absolute right to be consulted. And that means not only on how the proposals are to be implemented, but also whether they should go ahead in the first place.

“The Department for Health’s refusal to recognise this clear and important legal duty leaves us no option but to issue legal proceedings as a matter of urgency. ”



Latest news

‘Job centre in your pocket’ plan raises questions over role of AI in employment support

The government's AI-powered employment assistant has sparked debate about how technology should support jobseekers while maintaining trust.

Employers urged to spot gambling harms during World Cup

Employers are being urged to watch for gambling-related harm at work as the 2026 World Cup brings weeks of daytime matches and betting activity.

Habits for health: small changes that lead to bigger gains

From walking meetings to better sleep routines, simple habits can improve health, wellbeing and performance across the workplace.

Jeanette Wheeler: The business case for purpose-led leadership

Public scrutiny on businesses and societal expectations are putting pressure on leaders to demonstrate that purpose runs deeper than profit.
- Advertisement -

Britain’s biggest retailers cut 18,000 jobs as employment costs rise

Rising wage bills and tax costs are prompting retailers to rethink hiring as they seek savings across their operations.

Georges Elhedery on AI and job losses

“We all know generative AI will destroy certain jobs and will create new jobs.”

Must read

Ama-Afrifa Tchie: Has COVID-19 been a workplace equaliser?

"As lockdown restrictions ease, we must focus on protecting the wellbeing of the whole workforce and recognise the unique challenges that many people face."

Richard Manby: Working from Home – A Blessing or a Curse?

The last 20 years has seen a dramatic growth in flexible working as employees and employers recognise that the benefits far outweigh the disadvantages. In fact, a recent ‘Job Exodus’ survey conducted by Investors In People found that 34% of employees would prefer flexible working to a 3% pay rise.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you