Work scheme ”worse than doing nothing”

-

bad-news-at-workThe Department for Work and Pensions’ Work Programme – meant to find long-term employment for some of the most vulnerable people – managed to move an average of 3.6 per cent of benefit claimants into work between June 2011 and July 2012, well below the target of 11.9 per cent. The programme is thought to cost between £3bn and £5bn over a five-year period.

The Public Accounts Committee has said the performance of the scheme so far has been “extremely poor”. Indeed, it has been so poor that the figures are worse than the department’s own expectations of the number of people who would have found work if the programme didn’t even exist.

The best performing provider in the scheme moved 5 per cent of people off benefit and into work, while the worst managed to help 2 per cent. Blame has been cast on providers for “creaming and parking” the easiest to place people in an attempt to make the figures look good. But even this has failed.

Committee chair Margaret Hodge said: “It is shocking that of the 9,500 former incapacity benefit claimants referred to providers, only 20 people have been placed in a job that has lasted three months, while the poorest performing provider did not manage to place a single person in the under-25 category into a job lasting six months.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

She added: “Under the payment by results system, the department has incentives in place which in theory are supposed to prevent providers concentrating on the easiest cases and ignoring those who are hardest to help. But these incentives are not working and there is increasing evidence of ‘creaming and parking’. A provider that continues to underperform could become financially unsustainable. The department must identify cases where a provider is at risk of failing and ensure there are specific plans in place to deal with this.”

For Labour, the shadow work and pensions secretary Liam Byrne said the committee’s findings showed the “farcical” Work Programme’s “comprehensive failure” to bring down long-term unemployment, to the point that it worse than doing nothing.

“At a time when our economy is flat lining and David Cameron is giving a tax cut to millionaires, we desperately need a back-to-work programme that is fit for purpose,” he said. “That’s why Labour is calling for a compulsory jobs guarantee which will get every adult who has been unemployed for more than two years straight into a job.”

Latest news

‘Job centre in your pocket’ plan raises questions over role of AI in employment support

The government's AI-powered employment assistant has sparked debate about how technology should support jobseekers while maintaining trust.

Employers urged to spot gambling harms during World Cup

Employers are being urged to watch for gambling-related harm at work as the 2026 World Cup brings weeks of daytime matches and betting activity.

Habits for health: small changes that lead to bigger gains

From walking meetings to better sleep routines, simple habits can improve health, wellbeing and performance across the workplace.

Jeanette Wheeler: The business case for purpose-led leadership

Public scrutiny on businesses and societal expectations are putting pressure on leaders to demonstrate that purpose runs deeper than profit.
- Advertisement -

Britain’s biggest retailers cut 18,000 jobs as employment costs rise

Rising wage bills and tax costs are prompting retailers to rethink hiring as they seek savings across their operations.

Georges Elhedery on AI and job losses

“We all know generative AI will destroy certain jobs and will create new jobs.”

Must read

Ally Fekaiki: Employee benefits: how to fix the one common HR practice employees hate

Employee benefits famously a pain point for HRs and hated by employees. Amidst record level vacancies, they've also become key ammunition to entice talent, with companies constantly announcing new perks.

Sophie Milliken: What value do you feel that psychometrics adds to the recruitment/selection process?

Graduates find them frustrating as so many of them fail.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you