Fears for employers as default retirement age is set to be abolished

-

According to a survey conducted by Shoosmiths employers are deeply concerns about what will happen when the default retirement age of 65 is scrapped in October 2011.

The national law firm asked readers of its HR briefing, WortHReading, about retirement ages in their organisations, how they expected to deal with the abolition of the default retirement age and their concerns about the change.

Only 20% of those who took part in the survey worked in organisations that had already abolished retirement ages, with 80% still relying on a formal retirement age.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Participants of the survey were evenly split when it came to predicting whether organisations were expecting a significant increase in those wanting to work beyond 65: 42% thought most employees would still want to retire at 65, with 41% believing more would want to stay on.
Only half of respondents thought their organisation would abolish retirement ages altogether, 20% thought that retirement ages would be kept for some rolls but not others, while 23% thought they would retain a retirement age for all roles.

Partner and head of employment Kevin McCavish said: “While this might suggest that next year’s legal changes will have a significant practical impact on employers and employees, the results reveal that the retirement age may not be pensioned off as quickly as predicted.”

Employers’ main concerns were employees refusing to retire when they are no longer up to the job (75%), uncertainty of not knowing whether someone will be retiring or not (61%), increased difficulty of workforce planning (49%), negative effect on younger workers – lack of opportunity to progress/loss of motivation (43%), lots of older employees wanting to go part-time (42%), cost of providing benefits to older employees.



Paul Gray is an entrepreneur and digital publisher who creates online publications focused on solving problems, delivering news, and providing platforms for informed comment and debate. He is associated with HRZone and has built businesses in the HR and professional publishing sector. His work emphasizes creating industry-specific content platforms.

Latest news

Grant Wyatt: AI is as good as the standard you set

Most professionals treat AI like a vending machine: they click, prompt, and hope. When the output is mediocre, they blame the tool.

AI adoption accelerates as employers rethink workforce size

Employers are using AI to address staffing pressures, redesign roles and improve productivity as workforce planning increasingly incorporates automation.

Workers ‘pushing through illness’ as workplace pressure grows

Burnout, stress and working while sick are becoming increasingly common as many employees struggle to cope with workplace pressure.

‘Job centre in your pocket’ plan raises questions over role of AI in employment support

The government's AI-powered employment assistant has sparked debate about how technology should support jobseekers while maintaining trust.
- Advertisement -

Employers urged to spot gambling harms during World Cup

Employers are being urged to watch for gambling-related harm at work as the 2026 World Cup brings weeks of daytime matches and betting activity.

Habits for health: small changes that lead to bigger gains

From walking meetings to better sleep routines, simple habits can improve health, wellbeing and performance across the workplace.

Must read

Derek Miles: Why it’s time for a workplace pensions revolution

Emerging from Osborne’s somewhat underwhelming Autumn Statement last month,...

Dr Alex Linley: Why AI in HR needs the human touch

The 'human' in HR can be a very useful tool for AI.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you