The true cost of businesses recruiting the wrong person for the job

-

In the build up to October’s Talent Management & Leadership Development Summit, James Callander, Managing Director of FreshMinds Talent considers why employing the wrong person could be more than just a financial burden to businesses…

In today’s competitive marketplace, businesses need to make sure they get value for money. Employing the wrong person for a role is a costly mistake to make.

The cost implications of recruiting the wrong person are extremely high: recruiting costs a company approximately 25% in basic annual salary of the employee, plus the cost of time spent interviewing the candidate and then the cost of making them redundant.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Add on the internal time taken to cover the assessment of the poor hire and decision-making over an exit strategy –which is often expensive senior-level time. This is acute in small businesses or start-ups, where senior management time is business critical. Once the bad hire has been resolved, the recruitment process has to be repeated, incurring more cost and internal time. Any training and development spending on the outgoing employee will also be lost.

In terms of other costs to the business, it is easier to see the cost of hiring the wrong person if they are revenue generating, as you can compare their performance to the rest of the team. In top tier professional services such as consultancy, where we work extensively, the failure to sell can be very serious. In other roles such as in-house strategy teams, where we also operate, the cost can be less easy to identify and is related to lost opportunities either to develop the business or to save costs.

This is why it is even more important to invest in the recruitment process up front – much like doing extensive and high quality due diligence before a business deal.
Not only does employing the wrong person have serious financial implications, but it can also have an impact on the organisation as a whole. This is particularly apparent when recruiting for senior or team leader positions.

A spate of leavers from a team often follows from a bad hire if the personality fit is wrong. This can do long term damage to the morale of the team or business.

So what do businesses need to think about to ensure they recruit the right person? Before companies begin the recruitment process, it is important to undertake a thorough evaluation of what qualities and skills are required of a new recruit.

To do this, you need to begin by asking some key questions:

• Why do we want to recruit somebody?
• What’s the purpose of their job?
• What are their main duties going to be?
• And how will that fit in with other people in the organisation?

You also need to be able to measure and evaluate a potential new recruit’s skills effectively. The most common mistake companies make when interviewing is to rely too much on gut instinct. Subjective opinion will inevitably play some part in the recruitment process – we are all human – but this should be underpinned by a comprehensive, objective assessment of the candidate’s suitability and their skills across the entire performance spectrum.

If a company is clear on what factors make for consistently successful employees, that knowledge can be applied critically, enabling them to recruit to an objective benchmark moving forward.

Investment in the recruitment process and in skilled recruiters can help reduce poor hiring decisions. A good recruitment company will be able consistently to find candidates who add value to their clients’ businesses, which is something we really pride ourselves on at FreshMinds Talent. We also take time to understand company culture, values and environment to ensure a fit on that level as well.

The phrase about people being a company’s biggest asset may be a great cliché, but it’s still not understood by all. Underinvestment in other crucial assets such as technology or machinery would be seen as poor commercial decisions, so why would businesses not invest in recruitment and recruitment processes? If it’s a cost issue in terms of either internal time or recruitment fees, it’s worth remembering the housewives’ adage “buy cheap, buy twice”.



Latest news

Grant Wyatt: AI is as good as the standard you set

Most professionals treat AI like a vending machine: they click, prompt, and hope. When the output is mediocre, they blame the tool.

AI adoption accelerates as employers rethink workforce size

Employers are using AI to address staffing pressures, redesign roles and improve productivity as workforce planning increasingly incorporates automation.

Workers ‘pushing through illness’ as workplace pressure grows

Burnout, stress and working while sick are becoming increasingly common as many employees struggle to cope with workplace pressure.

‘Job centre in your pocket’ plan raises questions over role of AI in employment support

The government's AI-powered employment assistant has sparked debate about how technology should support jobseekers while maintaining trust.
- Advertisement -

Employers urged to spot gambling harms during World Cup

Employers are being urged to watch for gambling-related harm at work as the 2026 World Cup brings weeks of daytime matches and betting activity.

Habits for health: small changes that lead to bigger gains

From walking meetings to better sleep routines, simple habits can improve health, wellbeing and performance across the workplace.

Must read

Jonathan Attia: The new era of measured engagement

Measured engagement describes a way of working where employees choose to engage deliberately, landing in the sweet spot between ambition and balance

Simone Mink: The entry-level squeeze – how graduates must adapt to break into tech

The traditional pathway from degree to entry-level tech job has been disrupted. The number of junior roles advertised is shrinking, and the bar for entry is rising.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you