Gut instinct leads 7/10 managers into mistakes

-

According to the results of a study by workplace psychologists OPP, 71% of all line managers would change the people decisions they’ve made if given a second chance. It’s an indictment on the “gut instinct” culture that costs UK businesses millions of pounds in performance issues each year. Worryingly, nearly four in ten (39%) line managers said they still rely on gut instinct as one of the most important factors when making any decisions about their people. Twenty-five per-cent even admitted that whether they like someone personally was also a major influence.

There is one small ray of hope; people who had taken a psychometric (personality) test in the course of their career were twice as likely to find this kind of data important to them in making a range of decisions about people. This group is also much more likely to look for evidence in past behaviour than those who have not received feedback on a personality test in their career (68 vs 51%).

A major factor in this is managers’ mistaken belief that they truly know their people – a view not shared by employees. Ninety-seven per-cent of managers feel they know their people fairly well or better, as opposed to 74% of workers. Almost half (47%) of managers even say they know a great deal or everything there is to know about their people, while only 23% of employees share this view. Moreover, 45% said that they don’t trust their manager’s instincts on staff decisions relating to them or to others. The result is a workforce that is becoming increasingly distrustful of management decision-making.

Dr Robert McHenry, CEO of OPP, comments: “The results of this study make chastening reading for any management team. Organisations have to ask themselves why they demand objectivity and transparency in every other decision about resources, particularly in these difficult times when all investment is under scrutiny, but when it comes to people, they allow themselves to ‘fly blind’? Managers are making the wrong people decisions more often than not, unable even to stand by their decisions after the fact. Mistakes range from overestimating the potential of a person to discovering information further down the line that would have changed the decision. In any case, these decisions are often made covertly and in the absence of hard facts.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“Many managers place a lot of pride in their business instincts, but our study shows that this confidence isn’t shared further down the food chain. Workers are increasingly mistrustful of any decision made based on instinct alone, not least because it’s very difficult to explain or justify,

“The economic cost of bad people decisions is well documented. Putting the wrong people in the wrong jobs has a direct impact on productivity and efficiency, and the cost of reversing the decision is often considerable.

“Management habits need to change. It’s possible to obtain robust and objective information on which to decide. Considering proven, prior experience, data from psychometric testing and colleague feedback together creates a better foundation for these decisions. It’s the best way for businesses to manage risk when it comes to their people, and it’s a way that every CEO should demand.”



Paul Gray is an entrepreneur and digital publisher who creates online publications focused on solving problems, delivering news, and providing platforms for informed comment and debate. He is associated with HRZone and has built businesses in the HR and professional publishing sector. His work emphasizes creating industry-specific content platforms.

Latest news

‘Job centre in your pocket’ plan raises questions over role of AI in employment support

The government's AI-powered employment assistant has sparked debate about how technology should support jobseekers while maintaining trust.

Employers urged to spot gambling harms during World Cup

Employers are being urged to watch for gambling-related harm at work as the 2026 World Cup brings weeks of daytime matches and betting activity.

Habits for health: small changes that lead to bigger gains

From walking meetings to better sleep routines, simple habits can improve health, wellbeing and performance across the workplace.

Jeanette Wheeler: The business case for purpose-led leadership

Public scrutiny on businesses and societal expectations are putting pressure on leaders to demonstrate that purpose runs deeper than profit.
- Advertisement -

Britain’s biggest retailers cut 18,000 jobs as employment costs rise

Rising wage bills and tax costs are prompting retailers to rethink hiring as they seek savings across their operations.

Georges Elhedery on AI and job losses

“We all know generative AI will destroy certain jobs and will create new jobs.”

Must read

David Freedman: Successful negotiation – the death of the ‘one man band’?

You could hardly get a greater contrast. Between 2007-8,...

Marion Beauregard: How to become more resilient to stress, stay calm and focused

Stress is the normal physiological response of our body...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you