New pensions tax good but not good enough

-

After revising the proposals for restricting tax relief the new coalition government have improved proposals for tax relief on pension savings but there are still concerns.Mercer a global leader for trusted HR and related financial advice, products and services belives that four areas still need to be addressed to ensure a health environment for the UK’s retired.

The coalition announced the new regime last month stating that a personal annual pension saving allowance of between £30,000 and £45,000, with at least a 40% rate of tax on pension contributions over the threshold. It will raise £3.5 billion for the Government and will potentially affect many final-salary scheme members and high earners.
Deborah Cooper, head of Mercer’s retirement research group, said: “Certain elements of the current proposals will accelerate the demise of defined benefit (DB) occupational pension schemes unless changed – otherwise, employees on incomes just above the higher rate tax threshold could inadvertently become liable for tax charges greater than the amount of pension they have actually accrued.
“The loss of more DB schemes will precipitate a reduction in the overall savings level and increase the degree of risk individuals have to bear, resulting in more pensioners with insufficient incomes. This is not in the long-term best interests of the UK economy and will pull the rug from underneath the UK’s occupational pension system.

“The proposals also incentivise the current generation of senior management to drop out of pension provision. Hit those in companies who make the decisions on pensions and you undermine enthusiasm for the whole regime, to the detriment of us all.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Mercer believes that the current proposal will inhibit employers’ ability to provide pension schemes that are strategically right for their business and that support the long-term wealth creation of their staff.
It also believes that increasing the complexity and cost of DB pension provision will encourage employers to dumb down pension provision to the minimum acceptable level, which may not be in the best long-term interests of employers and employees, and the nation.



Latest news

‘Job centre in your pocket’ plan raises questions over role of AI in employment support

The government's AI-powered employment assistant has sparked debate about how technology should support jobseekers while maintaining trust.

Employers urged to spot gambling harms during World Cup

Employers are being urged to watch for gambling-related harm at work as the 2026 World Cup brings weeks of daytime matches and betting activity.

Habits for health: small changes that lead to bigger gains

From walking meetings to better sleep routines, simple habits can improve health, wellbeing and performance across the workplace.

Jeanette Wheeler: The business case for purpose-led leadership

Public scrutiny on businesses and societal expectations are putting pressure on leaders to demonstrate that purpose runs deeper than profit.
- Advertisement -

Britain’s biggest retailers cut 18,000 jobs as employment costs rise

Rising wage bills and tax costs are prompting retailers to rethink hiring as they seek savings across their operations.

Georges Elhedery on AI and job losses

“We all know generative AI will destroy certain jobs and will create new jobs.”

Must read

Teresa Budworth: A potentially useful free gift for Christmas!

Access to Work mental-health services launched by DWP - help for employers with employee mental health questions.

Teresa Budworth: I like the car, even if it is dangerous

Deciding how to get from A to B isn't...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you