Employers concerned about cost and admin burden of Additional Paternity Leave

-

Employers are concerned that the new Additional Paternity Leave (APL) rules will negatively impact their companies, according to law firm Davies Arnold Cooper.
The report shows 82% of employers surveyed think cost, absence or administrative burdens prove harmful.

The main employer concerns are cost of providing cover (35%), too many employees being absent (8%), administration costs (2%) or all of the above (48%)

But most employers (74%) think less than a quarter of eligible employees would take advantage of their new right to APL, which will enable new fathers to request up to six months’ paternity leave from April 2011 onwards.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The finding, that 64% of companies say at present less than a quarter of eligible employees in their organisations took any paternity leave, reinforces this.

When respondents stated they expected APL to be taken, half (53%) believed that employees would take less than one month of leave, while a further 43% believed employees would take no more than between one and three months.

Only 2% of respondents expect any of their employees to take the maximum six months available.

The self-certification process for the father concerned 76% of respondents, while 94% indicated they would prefer to be provided with information from the mother’s employer and a copy of the birth/adoption certificate automatically.

Whilst HMRC is going to undertake spot compliance checks, it does not seem that this sufficiently reassures employers. On a more positive note, 30% of respondents believed a benefit would be that mothers would return to work earlier and 42% also believed that greater flexibility in respect of childcare was advantageous to their organisation.

Wendy Trehy, partner and employment law specialist at Davies Arnold Cooper, said: “Despite the fact that there was a significant amount of consultation undertaken by the Government on the introduction of APL, employer opinion is divided and significant concerns remain. We will have to wait and see how many fathers do take up this right, what the costs to employers ultimately are and if this has the adverse impacts feared.

“Carefully tailored policies can eliminate many areas of concern; however, the cost to business will only be able to be assessed once we see how APL works with existing legislation.”



Latest news

‘Job centre in your pocket’ plan raises questions over role of AI in employment support

The government's AI-powered employment assistant has sparked debate about how technology should support jobseekers while maintaining trust.

Employers urged to spot gambling harms during World Cup

Employers are being urged to watch for gambling-related harm at work as the 2026 World Cup brings weeks of daytime matches and betting activity.

Habits for health: small changes that lead to bigger gains

From walking meetings to better sleep routines, simple habits can improve health, wellbeing and performance across the workplace.

Jeanette Wheeler: The business case for purpose-led leadership

Public scrutiny on businesses and societal expectations are putting pressure on leaders to demonstrate that purpose runs deeper than profit.
- Advertisement -

Britain’s biggest retailers cut 18,000 jobs as employment costs rise

Rising wage bills and tax costs are prompting retailers to rethink hiring as they seek savings across their operations.

Georges Elhedery on AI and job losses

“We all know generative AI will destroy certain jobs and will create new jobs.”

Must read

Ramkumar Chandraeskaran: Closing the digital skills gap, why UK firms must be more proactive to remain competitive

"Digital skills needs are expected to sky rocket in the coming years."

Catrina Hewitson: What prevents leaders from taking time for themselves

Mixed emotions about the idea of paying attention to ourselves prevent us from recognising the reasons why it should be a clear leadership responsibility.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you