Legal ruling could open door for flood of pay equality compensation claims

-

A group of female workers have won a landmark case in the Court of Appeal which could pave the way for hundreds more compensation claims over gender pay equality in the workplace.

The case involves 174 women, all former employees of Birmingham City Council, who claimed their employer was guilty of gender discrimination by denying them bonuses similar to those handed out to staff in traditionally male-dominated jobs such as refuse collectors, street cleaners, road workers and gravediggers.

Under current rules, only workers who are still employed or have left their employment within the last six months are eligible to take cases to an Employment Tribunal.

However, as the women, who worked as cooks, cleaners, caterers and care staff, had left their positions some time ago, they were ineligible to take their claim to tribunal and be granted compensation, despite the fact that in 2007 and 2008, tens of thousands of pounds were paid to female council employees to compensate them for pay inequalities.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

To get round this, the women took their case to the High Court, which has a six-year deadline for launching claims, and secured a judge’s ruling in their favour.

The council then took the case to the Court of Appeal, claiming that claims of this nature can only be dealt with by the Employment Tribunal.

However, the appeal was dismissed after judges unanimously ruled Birmingham City Council had failed to establish that the deputy judge’s ruling on the 1970 Equal Pay Act was wrong or in any way flawed.

This now opens the door for potential claimants in both the private and public sector who thought their claims were outside tribunal time limits to pursue actions for compensation.

Leigh Day & Co partner Chris Benson, representing the former employees, said: “Every judge that has considered this case in both the High Court and Court of Appeal has expressed the view quite clearly that these claims on behalf of our clients would be successful.”

Pamela Flores is an events professional with experience at Symposium Events, a UK-based conference and events organization. She has worked in editorial and event coordination roles within the HR and expatriate management sector, contributing to the organization of major conferences including the Expatriate Management and Global Mobility conference. Her background spans online editorial work and events management within the professional conference industry.

Latest news

Jeanette Wheeler: The business case for purpose-led leadership

Public scrutiny on businesses and societal expectations are putting pressure on leaders to demonstrate that purpose runs deeper than profit.

Britain’s biggest retailers cut 18,000 jobs as employment costs rise

Rising wage bills and tax costs are prompting retailers to rethink hiring as they seek savings across their operations.

Georges Elhedery on AI and job losses

“We all know generative AI will destroy certain jobs and will create new jobs.”

Vacancies fall to lowest level in five years as employers delay recruitment

UK vacancies have fallen to their lowest level in five years as employers delay permanent hiring and more workers compete for fewer roles.
- Advertisement -

NHS badge review raises wider questions about political expression at work

A government-backed NHS review has reignited debate over political symbols at work and how employers can balance protected beliefs with workplace conduct.

Andrew Fettes-Brown: Leading with curiosity – why the built environment needs a culture shift to allow for innovation

Curiosity creates the conditions for learning, growth and understanding. It encourages us to interrogate problems properly rather than rushing to solutions.

Must read

Ewan Carr: Staying mindful of reasonable adjustments during COVID-19

"There is a duty on employers to make reasonable adjustments if the employee is classed as disabled under the EqA and is placed at a ‘substantial disadvantage’ in comparison with persons who are not disabled."

Kate Palmer: The HR lessons from the Biden bow-out

What are the key HR takeaways from Biden's resignation?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you