Coalition plans cause uncertainty over paternity leave

-

Comments made in Parliament by Theresa May, Minister for Women and Equalities, suggest that regulations introduced by the Labour government to extend paternity leave for fathers could be postponed and, ultimately, rewritten by the Coalition.

The Additional Paternity Leave Regulations 2010, which were made just three weeks before Parliament was dissolved for the general election, give fathers of babies due on or after 3 April 2011 the right to take up to 6 months’ paternity leave (in addition to their existing two week entitlement).

However, the coalition’s ‘Programme for Government’ indicated that the new Government has different plans for paternity and maternity rights, promising a new ‘system of flexible parental leave’.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Asked by Julian Smith MP about her plans for the 2010 Regulations and for reassurance that parental leave rights would not be changed more than once in the current Parliament, Theresa May responded “we are looking into how we can avoid constantly requiring businesses to effect innovations, and we are examining the timetabling of the additional paternity leave and flexible parental leave regulations.”

Audrey Williams, head of discrimination at international law firm Eversheds comments:

“Under the Regulations that are due to apply from next year, fathers will only be able to take additional paternity leave if the mother has returned to work, and even then not before the baby is 20 weeks old. The coalition appears to prefer for a more radical approach that would give parents more flexibility over how and when they share leave between them, possibly including both parents taking time off simultaneously.”

“It would be unfortunate if the Government were to allow the existing Regulations to take effect only then to change the system a short time later. So it is reassuring to learn that the Government is alert to the difficulties that would cause. But employers and employees alike need to know sooner rather than later whether or not the Regulations will take effect next year.

“Employers have to put a lot of work into preparing for new legislation like this, understanding how the changes will affect their business, adapting policies and training staff. If they start, or continue, that process there will be abortive costs if the Government withdraws the Regulations. But if they don’t start preparing now they could be caught out if the Regulations take effect as originally planned.”



Latest news

‘Job centre in your pocket’ plan raises questions over role of AI in employment support

The government's AI-powered employment assistant has sparked debate about how technology should support jobseekers while maintaining trust.

Employers urged to spot gambling harms during World Cup

Employers are being urged to watch for gambling-related harm at work as the 2026 World Cup brings weeks of daytime matches and betting activity.

Habits for health: small changes that lead to bigger gains

From walking meetings to better sleep routines, simple habits can improve health, wellbeing and performance across the workplace.

Jeanette Wheeler: The business case for purpose-led leadership

Public scrutiny on businesses and societal expectations are putting pressure on leaders to demonstrate that purpose runs deeper than profit.
- Advertisement -

Britain’s biggest retailers cut 18,000 jobs as employment costs rise

Rising wage bills and tax costs are prompting retailers to rethink hiring as they seek savings across their operations.

Georges Elhedery on AI and job losses

“We all know generative AI will destroy certain jobs and will create new jobs.”

Must read

Hannah Robbins: Accommodating religion in dress codes at work

The way we choose to look and dress is seen as a way of expressing our personalities and beliefs. In the UK we have a lot of freedom around what we can wear in public but the issue around workplace dress codes, specifically in reference to religious beliefs, remains a controversial and difficult area to navigate.

Paul Berry: How to lead high-performing teams

The problem with performance is that it often gets equated with profitability or return on equity. In other words, the focus is on the outcomes, not the process. This creates a ‘results-driven’ culture, where teams become overly-focused on short-term gains.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you