Mothers paid 3% less at work per child

Mothers are paid three per cent less for every child they have compared to their female colleagues who do not have children, new research from Université Paris-Saclay reveals. Fathers suffer no such penalty at all.

Lionel Wilner, Director of Graduate Studies at engineering and statistics school ENSAE, founding member of Université Paris-Saclay, studied 16 years of data from organisations in the French private sector between 1995 and 2011 to uncover these disturbing findings.

He separated the effect of childbirth from other firm-specific wage determinants, and accounted for full-time and part-time work, to find that the difference between mothers and non-mothers is approximated a three per cent lower hourly wage.

The effect was found to be more pronounced after the birth of the first child.

Wilner finds that human capital depreciation – an often misused measure of the economic value of an employee’s skill set – is to blame, alongside discrimination against mothers at work. Mothers can be allocated a role with less risky assignments, so are less likely to receive bonuses or more likely to become trapped in low-wage trajectories.

Men do not experience any loss after childbirth, but do not enjoy any benefit suggested by previous research. This indicates that the so-called fatherhood premium has been eroded.

“Gender inequalities persist within households, in terms of the share of domestic work or bargaining power, but they also persist within firms,” says Wilner. “The gender pay gap, occupational gender segregation and the glass ceiling are the most striking examples – but an obvious example of gender inequality is related to childbirth. The motherhood penalty accounts for noticeable hourly wage differences following childbirth.

“This is both unfair and inefficient. It requires further public intervention, including campaigns against discrimination, development of on-the-job childcare, and extension of paternity leave. A paternity leave of the same duration as maternity leave would bring down this gender gap.”

Kate Headley, Director of HR and diversity consultancy, the Clear Company, adds

“Wilner’s research confirms what many commentators have long suspected – that rifts in the gender pay gap can be directly related to motherhood. Organisations need to create an inclusive culture to which equality and diversity are fundamental if they truly want to address gender inequality in the workplace. A reliance on targets or quotas to improve diversity and inclusion without a focus on fostering cultural change, will only perpetuate this issue, and risks putting mothers at an even greater disadvantage.”

Receive daily HR email updates from HRreview
Keep up to date with the latest news, blogs and thought leadership
  • Note: Please tick all three boxes.

    I understand that by clicking the 'submit' button I am agreeing to receive information about Black and White Trading Ltd's products and services, including:

One Comment - Write a Comment

  1. I’m not sure that on-the-job childcare is realistic for many employers especially smaller businesses but maybe a change in mindset is. A more pragmatic approach can be taken to encourage female talent into the workplace – for example, consider offering flexibility in how the hours are worked and focus more on objectives being met and desired outcomes rather than the time spent in the office, especially for roles where the person does not need to be in the office every day.

Post Comment