Fear or hope as maternity leave could be reduced

-

Maternity leave could be reduced to 18 weeks resulting in pay reductions for almost half of working mothers, unions have warned.
The Trades Union Congress (TUC) said that the government’s consultation on modern workplaces puts flexible working practices at risk.

Current legislation permits employed women to take 52 weeks off, with 39 weeks being paid and the remainder unpaid.

Employed fathers may take two weeks off after the birth of their child and receive statutory pay at a flat rate.

The government wants to change this system to allow for more shared parenting at the start of a child’s life.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

It has therefore proposed that women be provided 18 weeks of maternity leave and the remaining 34 weeks may be split between the parents as they see fit.

The TUC said it supports plans to encourage shared parenting, but said that the time new mothers are allowed to take off should be reduced to 26 weeks.

For the rest of the current year’s leave, parenting should be shared between the mother and the father.

Data analysed by the union group suggested that 60 per cent of working women who have taken leave to have children receive maternity pay above the statutory minimum.

As the vast majority of women get this for 26 weeks, reducing the designated leave to 18 weeks could lead some employers to reduce the length of contractual maternity pay.

This would effectively result in cuts in pay for women taking leave to have a baby.

“Weakening the right to request flexible working will give bad employers the wrong message and is the excuse they’ve been looking for to ignore requests,” said TUC general secretary Brendan Barber.

“The government should remember how successful and popular this right has been for parents over the last decade and put their needs ahead of the same old carping from business lobbyists.”

Latest news

‘Job centre in your pocket’ plan raises questions over role of AI in employment support

The government's AI-powered employment assistant has sparked debate about how technology should support jobseekers while maintaining trust.

Employers urged to spot gambling harms during World Cup

Employers are being urged to watch for gambling-related harm at work as the 2026 World Cup brings weeks of daytime matches and betting activity.

Habits for health: small changes that lead to bigger gains

From walking meetings to better sleep routines, simple habits can improve health, wellbeing and performance across the workplace.

Jeanette Wheeler: The business case for purpose-led leadership

Public scrutiny on businesses and societal expectations are putting pressure on leaders to demonstrate that purpose runs deeper than profit.
- Advertisement -

Britain’s biggest retailers cut 18,000 jobs as employment costs rise

Rising wage bills and tax costs are prompting retailers to rethink hiring as they seek savings across their operations.

Georges Elhedery on AI and job losses

“We all know generative AI will destroy certain jobs and will create new jobs.”

Must read

Bruce Nicholson and Chris Manning: What 2022 looks like for hybrid working

Some say that we’re more productive as a result of the move to remote and hybrid working, and that’s because we are producing more, but this is probably not relative to the effort we are putting in, write Bruce Nicholson and Chris Manning.    

Human Capital: Building Strategic Capabilities Through Focused Talent Management

Professor William Scott-Jackson, Director, Centre for Applied HR Research, Oxford Brookes University Business School argues that effective talent management requires a clear understanding of the organisation's strategic priorities
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you