The shadow business secretary for the Conservatives has announced plans to implement a ‘one in, one out’ policy for rules dictating employment law.
Speaking at the ongoing Conservative party conference, Ken Clarke announced that should the party get in at the next general election, it would not set any red tape without first making a compensatory cut in costs elsewhere.
“The excessive regulation that businesses – and the great public services – face, has to be swept away,” he added.
Such changes would be enforced by a new “star council”, which would work to make sure new employment law was well balanced against the scrapping of any existing regulations.
Another area of employment law which could be set to change under the Conservatives is the mandatory age of retirement.
The party announced this week it plans to increase the retirement age for men to 66 by 2016, while women will see the mandatory limit increased by 2020. See story here.
Related News:
2 Responses to “‘One in, one out’ for employment law”
RSS 2.0 feed.- Stress Prevention and Mental Wellbeing Forum
- Employer Branding Summit 2010
- RPO & e-Recruitment Forum 2010
- Talent Management and Leadership Development Summit 2010
- Expatriate Management and Global Mobility Conference 2010
- Employee Wellbeing Forum 2010
- Wake up to Learning Breakfast Briefing
- Equality and Diversity Forum 2010
- Employing & Vetting Non-UK Nationals 2010
- HR in the Public Sector 2010
- Leveraging HR Technology 2010
Click here to read the related news story
Click here to visit our bookshop
- CareersPartnershipUK on What Not to Wear
- CareersPartnershipUK on GCSE students need guidance
- CareersPartnershipUK on GCSE students need guidance
- Wendy Driscoll on Inequality transparent in the Public sector
- Rich DiGirolamo on Low employee morale ‘could harm output’
- September 2010 (4)
- August 2010 (146)
- July 2010 (155)
- June 2010 (144)
- May 2010 (104)
- April 2010 (122)
- March 2010 (118)
- February 2010 (95)
- January 2010 (87)
- December 2009 (76)
- November 2009 (58)
- October 2009 (55)
- September 2009 (57)
- August 2009 (59)
- July 2009 (85)
- June 2009 (81)
- May 2009 (83)
- April 2009 (55)
- March 2009 (55)
- February 2009 (77)
- January 2009 (48)
- December 2008 (57)
- November 2008 (31)
- October 2008 (50)
- September 2008 (56)
- August 2008 (41)
- July 2008 (50)
- June 2008 (49)
- May 2008 (51)
- April 2008 (50)
- March 2008 (44)



October 7th, 2009 at 1:07 pm
With regard to the “mandatory retirement age” – what mandatory retirement age – it won’t be there for much longer. With regard to the age at whihc you will qualify for your state pension – of course it has to increase, humans are living a lot longer, and we are generally fitter in our 60’s than ever before. Working a few extra years, maybe even until 70 will soon become the norm. If you want some ‘pension’ style income before 65, then I recommend you start investing and saving – e.g. using ISA’s which are tax free. All goverments labour and Conservative are encouraging people to save for their retirement. hence new ISA allowance increases etc. In my opinion they need to go further with this. As a nation we also need to teach our kids wealth education!
October 7th, 2009 at 1:14 pm
Agreed with many of the points Alan makes, however, the irony is that on the one hand we are told that we must work longer and pay more national insurance to get a pension, on the other we are also told that we can be forced to retire at 65.
Ours hasn’t been a spend and save society for a long time and our finance system is not condusive for saving for retirement. Pensions are being eroded, costing more for less benefit, and we are told to like it.