A union is urging that high heels be banned in the workplace to ensure the health and safety of employees.
The Trade Union Congress (TUC), which the Telegraph reports is "predominantly" made up of males, has claimed that such heels could count as discrimination towards women and may also contribute to leg injuries.
Tabled by the Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists, the TUC said that while stilettos may look good on the catwalks of Hollywood, they were not appropriate in the day-to-day workplace.
"Many employers in the retail sector force women workers to wear high heels as part of their dress code," the motion stated.
It added that more needed to be done to raise awareness of the problem "so that women workers and their feet are protected".
However, commenting on the news in an article for the Daily Mail, Maureen Rice said many women enjoyed wearing heels to work as it made them feel taller, both literally and psychologically.
Related News:
You can also follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.- Employment Law Forum 2010
- The Learning Forum 2010
- Employee Engagement 2010
- Managing a Temporary Workforce Forum
- European HR Leader’s Summit 2010
- Health @ Work Summit 2010
- Employer Branding Summit 2010
Click here to read the related news story
Click here to visit our bookshop
- HRreview Employee loyalty ‘increases’ on Employee engagement ‘priority for HR’
- Chris McGivern on Employee engagement ‘priority for HR’
- Ruth Milner on Workers with depression ‘may cause absence management problems’
- Dai Williams on Workers with depression ‘may cause absence management problems’
- Treasure Box Jewellery on Graduate job crunch ’set to ease’
- March 2010 (44)
- February 2010 (98)
- January 2010 (90)
- December 2009 (79)
- November 2009 (58)
- October 2009 (55)
- September 2009 (57)
- August 2009 (59)
- July 2009 (85)
- June 2009 (81)
- May 2009 (85)
- April 2009 (55)
- March 2009 (55)
- February 2009 (77)
- January 2009 (48)
- December 2008 (57)
- November 2008 (31)
- October 2008 (50)
- September 2008 (56)
- August 2008 (41)
- July 2008 (50)
- June 2008 (49)
- May 2008 (51)
- April 2008 (50)
- March 2008 (44)


